<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Look Beyond the &#8220;Fundamental Conflict&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://usablesecurity.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://usablesecurity.com/?p=4</link>
	<description>Every system has a user.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 20:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob Tannen</title>
		<link>http://usablesecurity.com/?p=4#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Tannen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 17:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usablesecurity.com/2005/03/12/look-beyond-the-fundamental-conflict/#comment-51</guid>
		<description>I agree that login/authentication systems (at least in their current mental-model based format) are a usability challenge.  But what are the usability issues unique to other types of security applications (e.g. viruses, spam, etc). I've seen very little written about these.  Any recommendations?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that login/authentication systems (at least in their current mental-model based format) are a usability challenge.  But what are the usability issues unique to other types of security applications (e.g. viruses, spam, etc). I&#8217;ve seen very little written about these.  Any recommendations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gunnar</title>
		<link>http://usablesecurity.com/?p=4#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Gunnar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usablesecurity.com/2005/03/12/look-beyond-the-fundamental-conflict/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Well said. The job of the software architect, as I see it, is to harmonize the "ilities". This means find force multipliers among what are treated as the various specialty concerns like security and usability. There is a lot of shared ground and values between security and usability, not the least of which is a shared goal of simplicity. The software architect should focus on the areas where the disciplines agree, and making a business case that shows the combined impact of improved risk management (security) and user experience (usability).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said. The job of the software architect, as I see it, is to harmonize the &#8220;ilities&#8221;. This means find force multipliers among what are treated as the various specialty concerns like security and usability. There is a lot of shared ground and values between security and usability, not the least of which is a shared goal of simplicity. The software architect should focus on the areas where the disciplines agree, and making a business case that shows the combined impact of improved risk management (security) and user experience (usability).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Dunck</title>
		<link>http://usablesecurity.com/?p=4#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Dunck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 00:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usablesecurity.com/2005/03/12/look-beyond-the-fundamental-conflict/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Small world, Julien.  (Ping, Julien is involved in Greasemonkey.  Julien, I just met Ping at SxSW).

Welcome to blogging, Ping.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Small world, Julien.  (Ping, Julien is involved in Greasemonkey.  Julien, I just met Ping at SxSW).</p>
<p>Welcome to blogging, Ping.  ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Usable security &#124; Semiologic</title>
		<link>http://usablesecurity.com/?p=4#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Usable security &#124; Semiologic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usablesecurity.com/2005/03/12/look-beyond-the-fundamental-conflict/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>[...] usable security, which promises to be an interesting read. 	Their perspective from looking beyond the &#34;fundamental conflict&#34; more or less summarizes the whole issue: 	 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] usable security, which promises to be an interesting read. 	Their perspective from looking beyond the &quot;fundamental conflict&quot; more or less summarizes the whole issue: 	 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ping</title>
		<link>http://usablesecurity.com/?p=4#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Ping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 06:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usablesecurity.com/2005/03/12/look-beyond-the-fundamental-conflict/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>That's me.  I'm Ka-Ping and i wrote this blog entry.  Thanks for the kind compliment!

I hope you stick around and chime in with your thoughts.  There will be a lot to talk about, and we're just getting started.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s me.  I&#8217;m Ka-Ping and i wrote this blog entry.  Thanks for the kind compliment!</p>
<p>I hope you stick around and chime in with your thoughts.  There will be a lot to talk about, and we&#8217;re just getting started.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julien Couvreur</title>
		<link>http://usablesecurity.com/?p=4#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Julien Couvreur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2005 19:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usablesecurity.com/2005/03/12/look-beyond-the-fundamental-conflict/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>I just noticed that you link to Ka on your frontage... So you odiously already knew his work...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just noticed that you link to Ka on your frontage&#8230; So you odiously already knew his work&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julien Couvreur</title>
		<link>http://usablesecurity.com/?p=4#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Julien Couvreur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2005 19:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usablesecurity.com/2005/03/12/look-beyond-the-fundamental-conflict/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Check out: http://www.andrewpatrick.ca/CHI2003/HCISEC/hcisec-workshop-yee.pdf

Ka-Ping Yee has done some great work, that provide guidelines for aligning security and usability. He in considering capability systems in particular but the guidelines are general: http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/~ping/sid/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out: <a href="http://www.andrewpatrick.ca/CHI2003/HCISEC/hcisec-workshop-yee.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.andrewpatrick.ca/CHI2003/HCISEC/hcisec-workshop-yee.pdf</a></p>
<p>Ka-Ping Yee has done some great work, that provide guidelines for aligning security and usability. He in considering capability systems in particular but the guidelines are general: <a href="http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/~ping/sid/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/~ping/sid/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
